课程内容除了ASP其他的几乎不好好讲
Exercises写的和屎一样只给答案完全不解释
Tutor在ED上一周回答一次还是挑着回答
选这课绝对是脑子抽抽了
All the assignments and the final exam are pretty challenging. In the final exam, a lot of reading has to be done while writing and thinking a lot, the time is not enough even for those whose mother tone is English.
The most important thing is that the lectures are really confusing!!!
Assignments 和期末考试难度拉满.期末考试阅读量巨大,写下冗长答案的同时还要思考,哪怕母语是英语也来不及.
最重要的是课讲得真的差!!!
One of the worst CSE courses, 3 lectures with different teaching style teaching 3 irrelevent sections. The last lecture Haris Aziz only covered definitions during the lecture but gave assignments on some unsolvable algorithm design problems. I have to say that unless you want to waste both your time and your money, please stay away from this course.
据说自从院长接管了此课。。。此课就没什么选择的价值了。。。据说很多人是为了凑星号课选的这门破课。一门课每4周一个老师开一个全新的chapter,彼此之间毫无关联,每年据说一个教研室抽签决定谁来讲课,讲课的人就讲自己负责研究的领域。。。这就导致hummm每个部分授课的水平参差不齐。。。尤其18S2的Aziz讲博弈论口音奇葩,上课讲的逻辑混乱,ppt例子又少又没有什么代表性。。。加上院长大人ass1的神奇批分。。。分数极为惨烈。。。。奉劝各位能不选千万不要选,因为感觉即便是单看内容,实用性也不强。
4418,两年中唯一一门有意识地选的水课(就我自己而言),这门课是AI方向的基础课。学的知识很理论,一共要求交三个作业,不用期中和期末考试,每个作业占总分的1/3,第二个作业有一个小编程题用的是ASP,跟着MessageBoard上老师给的提示就可以写出来了。
作者:陈迪威
链接:https://www.zhihu.com/question/24357695/answer/132740090
来源:知乎
著作权归作者所有,转载请联系作者获得授权。
- Excellent follow-up to AI. Goes over First Order logic, Prolog, and similar things. A lot of theory, but good stuff for higher-level AI. The constraint programming and general game playing is pretty cool
- Basically 3 assignments and nothing else. Which is cool, I guess? Would prefer to actually have labs where you get feedback. Content is interesting. Whoever called it an unfun clusterfuck was exaggerating a bit.